All profits are calculated for a Back/Lay LIABILITY Stake of 10 units.
Apr 4: ( + 0.9 units)
1. Errani v Bencic: Successful: +2.5 units
2. Cepelova v Hantuchova: Succcessful: +2.4 units
3. Wozniacki v Pliskova: Unsuccessful*: -4 units
Overall: 2/3 Successful: +0.9 units
* The Wozniacki-Pliskova match is deemed unsuccessful for the reason that the Stop Loss was hit early on. Woz led 3-0 at the start of the match and then it was all Pliskova in the first set. Pliskova won the first set 7-6. Pliskova motored along in the Tie-break and was up 2-0 in the second set. At this stage Wozniacki’s odds were at least 4.5. If you had acknowledged my tip of Pliskova playing well, this would have easily been a highly profitable market…
Related Posts
Spartan Tennis Trading Tips Results 14th January
Spartan Tennis Trading Tips Stats U.S. Open Days 1, 2 &3
Tennis Trading Stats Wimbledon Days 4 & 5
Tennis Trading Stats Wimbledon Day 2
Tennis Trading Stats Wimbledon Day 1
Tennis Trading Tips Stats 22nd – 25th June
Tennis Trading Tips Stats 20th & 21st June
Tennis Trading Tips Stats 16th – 19th June- Tennis Trading Tips Stats 13th – 15th June
2 Comments
Hi, my comment to match 4.4. Cepel vs. Hantuch. Cepel price went from 1.8 to 2.28 before match. Strange,isn’t it? Then in match was score 1:1 Cepel serv and b.b. Hantuch and at this time price hit 3.05,3.10,3.15. This means unsuccesful for those who backed Cepel at price 1.8 (this was Patrick’s tip) but succesful who backed Cepel later before match…..me too 🙂 Don’t you know why Cepel went high before match?
Hi Vladik
Wild market movements are rather common for most closely priced matches. Why they moved so much in this case I dont really know…
glad you profited…keep the comments coming in guys…
Patrick.
Add Comment