Tennis Trading Tips Stats March 23rd 2014

banner (1)
All profits are calculated for a Back/Lay LIABILITY Stake of 10 units.

Mar 23rd: ( -7.83 units)

1. Tsonga v Baghdatis: Unsuccessful: -4 units

2. Robredo v Benneteau: Successful: +2.45 units

3. Gasquet v Anderson: Successful: +3.22 units

4. Cibulkova v Cornet: Unsuccessful:  -4 units (updated)

5. Stephens v Wozniacki: Successful: +2.5 units

6. Suarez Navarro v Kanepi: Unsuccessful: -4 units

7. Lepchenko v Tomljanovic: Unsuccessful: -4 units

Sadly both our lay matches let us down, which made a big difference to our stats today…

Full 2014 Stats click here.

5 Comments

  • Vladiku Posted March 25, 2014 8:25 pm

    Hi , for me Cibulkova was unsuccessful . 2:5 and two set points down means strategy fails…unfortunatly..:-(

    • Patrick Ross Posted March 26, 2014 7:09 am

      Hi Vlad
      I am not sure what you mean. The tip was :
      Back [email protected], [email protected]
      Cibulkova stormed to a 5-0 lead here and this was successful within the first 3 games of the match. How can this be unsuccessful hence??
      Maybe you read the tip wrong?
      Patrick

  • Profitcsinalo Posted March 26, 2014 3:29 pm

    Dear Patrick,

    Vladiku is right. The trading tip was:
    “4. 18:30 – Cornet v Cibulkova
    Back [email protected], [email protected]
    https://tennis-trading-league.com/betfair-tennis-trading-tips-atpwta-sunday-23rd-march-2014/

    Cibulkova started poorly and the trading was unsuccessful.

    Patrick, you mean Williams v Cibulkova match, that was a winner trade but on 24 March.
    https://tennis-trading-league.com/betfair-tennis-trading-tips-atpwta-monday-24th-march-2014/

    • Patrick Ross Posted March 26, 2014 9:30 pm

      Sorry guys, my humble apologies. I had assumed your question was about the Venus v Cibu match.
      I’ve checked the stats, and it seems you are right here that the strategy failed early on eventhough our player won in 2 sets. I will update the stats accordingly.
      Regards
      Patrick

  • Vladiku Posted March 26, 2014 8:31 pm

    I mean 23.3. Cib vs. Cor 2:5 and 2 setpoints down. Not 25.3. Cib vs.V.Wil there was 5:0 for Cib….

    This is not so important to me – important thing is that you made great job so far!!! 🙂

Add Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *